Math, as complex as it seems to be, based on the single most important fundamental construct, that is the number 1.
The number 1 itself is an identity that can be equal to anything you want to reason with. 1 car, 1 atom, 1 universe, etc. There are numerous mathematical manipulations and types of numbers but they are just to quantify the identity itself. It doesn’t deny the fundamental construct of 1 as an identity.
If physics can be described by math well, it seems to me that the fundamental construct of physics have to be just like the fundamental construct of math, which is 1. That means, the most fundamental construct of physics consist of many of the exact same thing. These fundamental building blocks of reality must be identical and consistent so they can be described by math. If they are not identical, describing them with math will be much more problematic because the identity and the number it represents does not map correctly in any equations. For example 1 = 1 and not 1 = 3 or 1 = 8 at different points in time or space. That fundamental building block has to be eternally consistent and not randomly change by itself.
It also seems to me the only things different between the building block is the relational relationship of these building blocks. Everything else should be the same
We usually say things exist in space and travel through time. That would mean things and space are 2 different things. That’s problematic because …